I've been following the development of Android 17 with keen interest, and a recent leak has given us a peek at some potential UI changes. It looks like Google might be addressing some user complaints while also making some potentially controversial decisions.

A New Look for Quick Settings?

According to sources, Google is making headway on a revamped dual-shade Quick Settings layout. If you are familiar with Android skins from companies like Samsung or Xiaomi, the design of split notification and Quick Settings panels may be familiar to you already. The leak suggests that Google has polished this feature, making it likely to appear in Android 17.

However, there's a catch. It seems that foldable phones and tablets might be forced to use this new split layout on their larger screens. There won't be an option to revert to the classic combined notification panel. I can see how this might be frustrating for some users who prefer the unified look, even on larger screens.

Imagine you're using your foldable device in tablet mode. Swiping down from the left side will bring up your notifications, while swiping down from the right will access Quick Settings. While this makes sense from a usability standpoint on larger displays, the lack of choice might not sit well with everyone.

Separate Wi-Fi and Mobile Data Toggles are Back!

In more positive news, it seems Android 17 might finally undo one of Google's most criticized UI changes. For years, people have grumbled about the combined Quick Settings internet tile that merged Wi-Fi and mobile data into a single toggle. It looks like Google is finally listening to the feedback and bringing back separate toggles.

This is a welcome change, in my opinion. Having separate toggles gives users more control and makes it easier to manage their connections. I think the return of separate Wi-Fi and mobile data toggles is a step in the right direction.

While I welcome the return of separate toggles, the potentially forced split-screen layout on foldable devices gives me pause. Ultimately, the success of these changes will depend on how well they are implemented and how receptive users are to the new design.